One quarter of all terrestrial native bird species have become extinct since human arrival in New Zealand, leading to a pervasive silence in many natural environments due to the decrease in native bird song. Passive acoustic techniques are a potential tool for environmental monitoring, especially for testing whether the control of mammals can reverse the ‘silent forest’ effect. Here we compare soundscapes from two nearby sites within the Waitakere Ranges Regional Park, New Zealand, that have contrasting predator control levels: one with high-level pest mammal control, and the other with low-level pest control. Measurements of twelve acoustic indices extracted from two seasons of passive acoustic recordings are split into 20 acoustic regions to identify which regions best discriminate between the two management regimes. We define the acoustic regions as units of analysis bounded by a specific time period and frequency range chosen to capture the main groups of biologically relevant acoustic events within a soundscape. Analysis of variance and pairwise comparisons indicated the acoustic region bounded from 9 pm to 11:59 pm and a range of 0.988–3.609 kHz in autumn presented the greatest differences between sites. The sounds responsible for these acoustic differences were generated by invasive mammals in the site with no pest control. Results also supports spring season as the most important for bird monitoring in New Zealand. Acoustic indices analysis did not detect a reversal of the “silence forest” effect in the site with high-level predator control.
關(guān)鍵詞
SM5聲紋記錄儀 鳥(niǎo)類(lèi) 動(dòng)物 蝙蝠 鳴聲記錄儀 鳥(niǎo)類(lèi)聲紋記錄儀
